A
Moment of Silence
Martin Brian & O’Keeffe, 1979
Books & Bookmen,
Christopher Hitchens, March 1979:
Born of first-generation Zionist immigrants (sic) (Simon Louvish) had
to spend many sweaty days in the occupied territories, discovering
that not everybody regarded Israeli occupation as a boon. From this
point he tracked back through his own family traditions, and his own
native ideology, to find out about the Palestinian problem, a problem
he had been trained to think did not exist. He writes with ease and
irony, and does not spare himself the thought that his critique may
be self-centered or irrelevant. ‘Jewish self-hate’ is the
usual insult thrown at israeli dissidents, and some of them half-suspect
that in their own cases it may be true. I think Louvish is genuine,
though… As Louvish points out, other nationalities can oppose
their own governments without endangering their own identity… Louvish’s
book is really an attack on chauvinism, and a cry of disgust at its
very existence among Jewish people who have themselves suffered so
much as a result of it… Louvish realises there is an ‘original
sin’ in Israel, that of the Palestinian refugees it created.
He knows that there will be war until this debt is paid off… A
reminder of the persistent Jewish radical tradition.
The Listener, John Naughton, 22 March 1979:
Formally uncomplicated and straightforward in its narrative structure,
A Moment of Silence is depressing in the extreme. The brutal exigencies
of the Israeli position and the harsh attitudes dictated by the need
to survive are well articulated by his all-too-credible characters;
the promised land seems now to promise only unending violence and terror.
The Arabs and the Israelis come to resemble the partners in a doomed
Irish marriage: denied the possibility of separation or peaceful coexistence,
they are condemned to live manacled to one another, till death does
them part.
From The Jewish Chronicle, March 1979:
In A Moment of Silence… Simon Louvish, a sabra (sic) living as
a film-maker in London, shows autobiographically how a young Israeli
can realise with a sudden shock that the Israelis apparently took their
land from the Arabs, and can then proceed step by step to see Israeli
ideology as a mixture of religious obscurantism and anti-Arab militarism.
Easy enough to disagree with from start to finish, but a clear presentation
of the Matzpen outlook.