City of Blok
William Collins & Sons 1988
Flamingo paperback 1989
Madness Now and to Come –
Bryan Cheyette, The Times Literary Supplement, October 14-20 1988:
Simon Louvish was born in Glasgow but was taken to West Jerusalem at
the age of two, where he spent his next nineteen years, serving as
an army cameraman during the Six Day War. Since leaving Israel in 1968,
Louvish has co-produced a series of controversial political documentaries
about South Africa, Greece and the occupied West Bank and has written
an autobiographical work and two novels, The Therapy of Avram Blok
(1985) and The Death of Moishe Ganef (1986). City of Blok is the sequel
to Louvish's first novel and is a far better work of fiction. All three
of his novels juxtapose recent Israeli history with grotesque fantasy,
rather like a Jewish One Hundred Years of Solitude, but City of Blok
is the most clearly focused, primarily because it concentrates specifically
on the heady years of Israeli nationalism which reached a new peak
with the election of Menachem Begin in 1977 and the Lebanon War in
1982.
City of Blok is set during these fateful five years and opens with
Avram Blok- "The Man with No Past" - leaving his Jerusalem
asylum (his place of refuge in The Therapy of Avram Blok). Forced into
the maelstrom of Levantine politics, Blok encounters Jewish fascists,
Palestinian resistance, and Israeli Peaceniks - in short a world "composed
of a thousand splinters". Rather like Nathan Zuckerman, Philip
Roth's alter ego in his recent series of novels, Blok illustrates the
dangerous blurring of fiction and reality which occurs in a city like
Jerusalem-or, even, Newark, where, in Louvish's words, "the past
has taken over the present". Louvish is rather more frenzied than
Roth - though no less humorous - but, unlike Roth, he excels as a political
satirist in the school of Heller and Vonnegut. The form of City of
Blok, moreover, imitates the "fractured" society into which
Louvish's persona is plunged. A consistently developing narrative is
replaced with a random collection of stories, anecdotes and unconpected
episodes (which even include the adventures of a ferocious pet cat). "Babel" is
the title of one of Louvish's chapters reflecting an absurd world where
all voices - meaningful and meaningless - are equally valid.
What the nihilism of City of Blok deliberately obfuscates, however, is that many
of the episodes and stories in it are, in fact, true. Louvish invents the newspaper
headlines dotted throughout the novel, but the newspaper cuttings, taken from
his "Blokbook", are real enough. Louvish's Jerusalem - Blok's city
- is unlike the mythologized Jerusalem of Amos Oz or A. B. Yehoshua. No writer
has captured better - in city walks and bus routes - the minutiae of present-day
Jerusalem and, at the same time, illustrated the Unreal qualities of the city
to confirm Jonathan Miller's description of it as a "Jewish Disney Land".
Louvish's intention, clearly, is to reproduce contemporary history as if it were
pure fantasy. Was there really a televised State burial of martyred skeletons,
many thousands of years old, found recently in caves in the Judaean desert? And,
if this were true - and it is - then perhaps there was a secret assignment by
the Department of Apocalyptic Affairs to track down a sheep made radioactive
by Palestinian guerrillas. Yet, if all viewpoints are equally absurd in this
novel, then Louvish merely reinforces what one of his characters calls the "deification
of the irrational", or, citing Bunuel, he accepts "as real" the "world
of the imagination".
City of Blok is especially powerful when it finally differentiates between its
proliferating Babel of voices. The Palestinian episodes are particularly convincing
in this regard and the novel makes out a passionate case - based on what look
like actual soldiers' letters home - against the horrific Lebanon incursion.
A biblical mock-mythology, underpinning the novel, is hardly distinguishable
from the various historical and political mythologies woven into the narrative
of City of Blok. At one point, Blok is accused by his German girlfriend, Ilse,
of "absolute moral neutrality . . . a general negation of all values".
This amorality is, I think, a problem for Louvish. His commitment to a saner
world is clear but his fiction is in danger of becoming an unmediated reflection
of the irrationality it condemns.'On one level, this makes reading Louvish particularly
terrifying. For he has probably anticipated - better than anyone outside Israel
- further madness to come.
The Daily Telegraph, Julia Neuberger, April 1, 1989:
…
There is Simon Louvish’s hysterical City of Blok. It is outrageous,
it will offend the religious, it will cause trouble among Zionists
and anti-Zionists and particularly among psycotherapists, and it is
full of passages in extremely bad taste, which still – albeit
gruesomely – make one smile.
The writing is very self-confident, very sharp and full of bad language. This
is not for the delicatelt stomached, nor for those who cannot bear the Jewish
novel. But if Roth makes you laugh, Louvish will make you clutch your belly
in hysterics. It’s very, very funny.
The Sunday Times, Colin Greenland, 30 October 1988:
In Simon Louvish’s City of Blok history obtrudes and intrudes.
History roams the streets of Jerusalem shouting at the top of its voice.
The second volume of Louvish’s projected trilogy about the stolid
nobody Avram Blok is a panorama in collage of the city at the end of
the 1970’s, between the Camp David Peace Treaty and the resumption
of the war with Lebanon. While all around him are sweltering and yammering,
Blok remains taciturn and vague. Released from mental hospital, he
does nothing for 370 pages but read screenplays for films that will
never be made, permit amorous attentions from a German anarchist and
a Jewish policewoman, and appear briefly on stage (where he reads a
newspaper and pretends to sleep).
City of Blok is rich, one might say bloated, with incidentals; with what Louvish,
typically, calls “the ooze of the world.” It is full of puns and
epigrams, lists, routes, menus, obsessions and monologues and catenaries of
word association. Blok occupies the centre of it like a kind of moral vacuum,
into which his country energetically crams itself.
The Literary Review, Alexander Games, November 1989 (Paperbacks):
‘
Scribble, scribble, scribble.’ ‘Clump, clump, clump.’ ‘Asargelusha!
Trojan fizzigigs!’ It can’t be easy to be inside Simon
Louvish’s head when all you wanted was a quiet Sunday afternoon
nap and a cup of tea. This, the third (sic) mono-tirade in the Blok
series, is the literary equivalent of a double-espresso. Avram Blok
is released from the State Mental Hospital, back into a red-eyed, hoarse-throated
Israeli landscape filled with lunatic rabbis, corrupt politicians and
a constant stream of refugee story-lines. Read it with pleasure and
enjoy Louvish’s screwball humour and brimming imagination.
From the Jewish Gazette, Arthur Sutherland, 2 December 1988:
All Mediterranean life is here – muddled by satirical crudity,
wry wit and outrageous obscenities more suited to an Army barrack room.
Descriptive passages read like a Thesaurus, yet the author achieves am articulate
account with commedable prose.
I enjoyed most of this book, but not the repetitive heretic verbiage.
By all means buy the book and enjoy – but then place it on a high bookshelf
out of reach of your children – unless they are studying for a degree
in obscene expletives.
From the Jewish Quarterly, spring 1989, essay by Moris Farhi on Israeli
Writers:
MAPPING PATHS TO REDEMPTION
Recent Books by Yoram Kaniuk and Simon Louvish.
…
Most of those who have read The Therapy of Avram Blok, Louvish’s
first novel, must have rejoiced at the emergence of a new voice which
was both original and anarchic. City of Blok, its sequel, again gives
us the pleasure of those same gifts. In fact, this second volume, written
with anger in preference to hysteria, is clearer in its message and,
therefore, a more mature work.
Anarchism demands total commitment to truth and freedom. As such, it
is often the vital constituent which makes a writer noteworthy. It
takes great courage
to be anarchic. Traditions, institutions and ruling bodies which abuse or
misuse authority, armed as they are with that self-righteousness which has
brought mankind to the brink of extinction, are formidable forces. Should they
fail to crush the anarchist, they still manage to reduce his valour to quixotry
or to banish him into the wilderness where, they assume, few, if any, can hear
him. In the present political climate where the pendulum has swung to the right,
where, in the West, brutal economic feudalism and, in Israel, a Zionism dispossessed
of its humanistic ethos, arc the paradignts, the anarchist's struggle becomes
all the more Sisyphean.
Fortunately for us, these brave voices, because they carry man's highest aspirations,
are heard even from the wilderness. Louvish's voice is one such.
Louvish writes primarily about Israel. His hero, Avram Blok, born on an illegal
immigrant ship to a Hungarian couple who have survived the Holocaust, is the
same age as the Jewish state. He is a remarkable creation: one part impassively
recording, as if it were a camera, the life around him; another, judging and
interpreting the behaviour of the nation to events and forces within and without;
a third, like an inverted Dorian Gray, succeeding in remaining pure and innocent
whilst all things evil contaminatc all things good; a fourth which, this reader
suspects, will gain ascendancy in Louvrish's planned third book on Blok, taking
on the mantle of Isaiah's Suffering Servant.
City of Blok starts in 1977, when Avram Blok, institutionalized since the end
of the Yom Kippur War, is released from the State Mental Hospital: "A
man without a past", he settles in Jerusalem, the city of the title, "which
lives only in the past". The book ends in 1982, by which time Blok has
witnessed the rise o€ Begin, the Camp David Accord, the assassination
of Sadat, the growth of Palestinian nationalism and resistance, the Lebanon
War and the maturation of the Peace Now movement. Ostensibly, Blok lives through
these events with a detachment which a German girl-friend indicts as "too
close to nihilism – a general negation of all values". Yet the reader
perceives that the accusation is unjust, that Blok’s apparent dispassion
is the paralysis of perpetual shock, that, on a deeper plane, he is evaluating
all moral issues. This other plane – more a sixth sense than psychological-is
represented by a host of 'phantasmal happenings which run parallel to the historic
events and involve such "characters" as a fiendish cat, a rabid sheep,
a resurrected Theodor Herzl, an ever-watchful Saladin and a sinister institution
called the "Department of Apocalyptic Affairs". Thus when Blok does
the "right thing" by throwing himself on a grenade flung at a crowd
during a demonstration against the Lebanon War, it is, one feels, this other
plane which has motivated his otherwise inexplicable heroism. Mercifully, the
grenade fails to detonate and Blok leaves Israel. He will return, we presume,
in the next volume, to chart the post-1982 events which have so damaged Israel
and which now, in the harsh, visionless diplomacy of Shamir and company, augur
even worse.
City of Blok is an ambitious book. It would not have achieved its objectives,
as it does, had its anarchic purposefulness not been supported by literary
skills.
The fabric of the prose is admirable; the way, in particular, Louvish weaves
into the text the very substance of Jerusalem is exceptional: you can see the
sacred city's colours, sniff its smells, breathe its dust and air, walk round
its antiquities and high-rises and, all the while, absorb a great deal of its
long and chequered past. Louvish is also adept at juxtaposing surreality with
reality. Though the surreality, in this reader's opinion, is often laboured,
there are times when it attains the quality of Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master
and Margarita, Jaroslav Hacek's The Good Soldier Svejk or Edward Whittemore's
majestic quartet, Sinai Tapestry, Jerusalem Poker, Nile Shadows and Jericho
Mosaic.
Above all, it is Louvish's passion--his fulminating anger-that elevates City
of Blok to excellence. The sections condemning the martial spirit and, in particular,
the last part of the book which bewails that abominable and criminal adventure,
the Lebanon War, are no less than brilliant. Take this excerpt from a letter
a friend of Blok's writes from the front:
A mass of people like some apocalyptic movie of the damned. Clustering about
us, clamouring for food and water. Some of the men give them their K-rations.
Others sneer and wave them away, shouting "Go to Arafat!" I see men
who at winter manoeuvres gave their last blanket to a friend who was caught
short, acting like insane hyenas. I see the unit gathering prisoners, marking
their arms with black spots… I see high-ranking officers, in charge of
water carriers, standing over their closed taps smiling above the thirst-crazed
throng. I hear expressions of contempt that raise goose pimples: "They
are less than animals." "They should be poisoned, like vermin." I
can't believe my cars. Wasn't it all so fucking predictable? Didn't we foresee
the whole thing?
This is the Jewish soul shouting warnings from the wilderness.
 |
| |
|
|
|